Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Date: 2018-07-12 22:39:38
Message-ID: 07e1cbfa-7c9b-17da-4cba-43b554c4b29c@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/12/2018 06:34 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-12, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> I fully understand. I think this needs to go back to "Waiting on Author".
> Why? Heikki's patch applies fine and passes the regression tests.
>

Well, I understood Claudio was going to do some more work (see
upthread). If we're going to go with Heikki's patch then do we need to
change the author, or add him as an author?

cheers

andew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ideriha, Takeshi 2018-07-13 00:33:31 RE: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-07-12 22:34:05 Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem