| From: | "Wang, Shenhao" <wangsh(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | handle a ECPG_bytea typo |
| Date: | 2020-07-24 08:05:23 |
| Message-ID: | 07ac7dee1efc44f99d7f53a074420177@G08CNEXMBPEKD06.g08.fujitsu.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, hackers
The source looks like:
case ECPGt_bytea:
{
struct ECPGgeneric_varchar *variable =
(struct ECPGgeneric_varchar *) (var->value);
......
}
I think the developer intend to use struct ECPGgeneric_bytea instead of struct ECPGgeneric_varchar
Is this thoughts right?
I have wrote a patch to fix this typo
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Fix-ECPGt_bytea-typo.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ajin Cherian | 2020-07-24 08:13:26 | Re: logical replication empty transactions |
| Previous Message | Ajin Cherian | 2020-07-24 07:40:17 | Re: logical replication empty transactions |