On 17.06.26 07:10, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> I found a bug with FOR PORTION OF: you shouldn't be able to provide it
> while using WHERE CURRENT OF with a cursor, but you can. (And it
> doesn't do anything sensible.)
>
> According to the SQL standard, combining these is not allowed: you can
> give FOR PORTION OF with an <update/delete statement: searched> but
> not an <update/delete statement: positioned>. I've attached a patch to
> raise an error if you try to use both.
committed