| From: | David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bricolage: Impressive |
| Date: | 2004-01-20 06:29:37 |
| Message-ID: | 04EE9700-4B12-11D8-8158-000A95972D84@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Jan 19, 2004, at 12:44 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> k, seperate VM isn't an issue ... but what is it doing that it needs
> its
> own machine? God, I thought Java programs were the worst, you are
> saying
> that this needs more then jakarta-tomcat processes?
>
> David?
It typically starts up using around 25MB per process (shared). It's not
uncommon for processes to swell upwards of 50MB or more. Then there are
the PostgreSQL processes.
Hey, you want a lot of functionality, you got to pay for it.
Cheers,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Wheeler | 2004-01-20 06:32:20 | Re: Bricolage: Impressive |
| Previous Message | David Wheeler | 2004-01-20 06:26:00 | Re: Bricolage: Impressive |