| From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: autonomous transactions |
| Date: | 2016-10-06 12:12:03 |
| Message-ID: | 048639f9-8b26-38be-9e57-29262ff071ce@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/10/16 11:56, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> * The labelling "Autonomous Transaction" is a simple coat of paint,
> which can easily be transferred to a better implementation if one
> comes. If one doesn't then its better to have something than nothing.
> So I suggest we commit Background Transactions first and then in a
> fairly thin commit, implement Autonomous Transactions on top of it for
> now and if we get a better one, switch it over.
>
+1 to this
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Дмитрий Воронин | 2016-10-06 12:17:13 | psql autocomplete works not good in USER command in 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-10-06 11:19:48 | Re: Fast AT ADD COLUMN with DEFAULTs |