Re: Feeds Integration

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "David Costa" <geeks(at)dotgeek(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feeds Integration
Date: 2004-02-20 19:07:04
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F44A@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
> Sent: 20 February 2004 17:22
> To: Dave Page; David Costa; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Feeds Integration
>
> Dave,
>
> > I thought we had agreed not to do that in the end?
>
> Had we? When?
>
> My memory ... and e-mailbox ... was that the discussion had
> been tabled because of the lack of an administrator for
> GForge, and the amount of effort required to migrate off GBorg.

Well I don't remember the administrator thing, but yes, my recollection
is that we had shelved the idea due to the difficulty in migrating
people from one platform to the other.

> However, a number of things have come up in the last few
> months to make the use of a better collaboration tool more
> compelling -- enough so that I'm
> willing to put some work behind it.

What's come up recently? I don't remember seeing anything.

Still, perhaps it would be worth asking the project owners what they
would like to do? As admin for a few myself I would vote against a move.
At least one of them would require significant work on my part to
migrate.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-20 19:24:36 Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-20 17:22:00 Re: Feeds Integration