From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "David Costa" <geeks(at)dotgeek(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feeds Integration |
Date: | 2004-02-20 19:07:04 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F44A@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
> Sent: 20 February 2004 17:22
> To: Dave Page; David Costa; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Feeds Integration
>
> Dave,
>
> > I thought we had agreed not to do that in the end?
>
> Had we? When?
>
> My memory ... and e-mailbox ... was that the discussion had
> been tabled because of the lack of an administrator for
> GForge, and the amount of effort required to migrate off GBorg.
Well I don't remember the administrator thing, but yes, my recollection
is that we had shelved the idea due to the difficulty in migrating
people from one platform to the other.
> However, a number of things have come up in the last few
> months to make the use of a better collaboration tool more
> compelling -- enough so that I'm
> willing to put some work behind it.
What's come up recently? I don't remember seeing anything.
Still, perhaps it would be worth asking the project owners what they
would like to do? As admin for a few myself I would vote against a move.
At least one of them would require significant work on my part to
migrate.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-20 19:24:36 | Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-20 17:22:00 | Re: Feeds Integration |