Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster
Date: 2026-09-01 08:30:45
Message-ID: 036F65ED-E913-4759-9C33-2B823A45BFBA@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 1 Sep 2026, at 07:00, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 30.08.2026 23:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

>>> Yes, this change makes the test pass (50 iterations) reliably for me.
>>>
>> Cool, thanks for testing. Just so I understand, both the issues you had
>> observed were fixed by this or just one of them?
>
> Yes, both cases are not reproduced with the wait.
>
> UPD: Sorry, I forgot to push Send yesterday.

No worries, thanks for confirming. Will push the fix to master and backpatch to 19.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2026-09-01 08:32:10 foreign_key test is sensitive to the OID counter
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2026-09-01 08:23:25 Re: right() returns the whole string for the most negative n