mistake in sql99 compatibility?

From:	"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To:	<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Date:	2002-06-27 09:40:00
Message-ID:	027501c21dbe$9c194a10$0200a8c0@SOL
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2002-06-27 09:40:00 from "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>  2002-06-28 18:57:27 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>   2002-06-28 19:21:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>    2002-06-28 19:29:37 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>   2002-06-28 19:35:21 from nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway)   2002-06-29 04:14:56 from "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Responses

• Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility? at 2002-06-28 18:57:27 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Jeroen T. Vermeulen	2002-06-27 10:05:21	Case sensitive searches
Previous Message	Karel Zak	2002-06-27 08:22:13	Re: Object Oriented Features