Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Date: 2008-09-24 14:55:18
Message-ID: 00a201c91e55$8f912f80$0b01a8c0@IBMC9A0F63B40D
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Hi.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> What about this line?
>
> #define STRLEN_MAX 255
>
> Are we really sure the strftime format cannot be longer than that?

Ahh, although the place to replace is here, is it said that MAX_L10 N_DATA is suitable?
--
cache_locale_time(void)
{
..
char buf[MAX_L10N_DATA];
..
strftime(buf, MAX_L10N_DATA, "%a", timeinfo);

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-09-24 15:13:59 Default SHMMAX on Linux
Previous Message Hiroshi Saito 2008-09-24 14:55:10 Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-09-24 16:04:22 Re: hash index improving v3
Previous Message Hiroshi Saito 2008-09-24 14:55:10 Re: Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.