Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Date: 2021-09-03 16:24:04
Message-ID: 00CD585F-EA5C-422C-8765-F5BCCBB43147@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 6 Apr 2021, at 09:46, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 11:36 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:

>> I don't know if Seamus is still working on that; if not, we might
>> mark it as "returned with feedback".
>
> I have to agree given the time left.

This thread has stalled and the patch no longer applies. I propose that we
mark this Returned with Feedback, is that Ok with you Amit?

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2021-09-03 16:35:30 Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-09-03 15:49:34 Re: pg_receivewal starting position