| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Simon Riggs'" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CommitFest #3 and upcoming schedule |
| Date: | 2012-12-10 03:52:25 |
| Message-ID: | 009e01cdd689$c5184c60$4f48e520$@kapila@huawei.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday, December 09, 2012 9:27 PM Simon Riggs
> On 16 November 2012 07:20, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Let's bring balance to the situation through our own actions. Please
> review one patch now for every one you submitted.
In CF-3, I am Author of 5 and Reviewer of 5
3 of my patches as Author have been moved from CF-2
4 of the patches where I am reviewer have been moved from CF-2
One of my Patch : Patch for option in pg_resetxlog for restore from WAL
files
is dependent on another patch XLogReader, so I am expecting to get it done
only after XLogReader.
I wanted to know if I should attach myself as reviewer to more patches as
per initial policy of CF?
In anycase as soon as I get time I shall review more patches.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2012-12-10 04:13:27 | Re: [PATCH]Tablesample Submission |
| Previous Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2012-12-10 03:00:29 | Re: Submission Review: User control over psql error stream |