| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
| Date: | 2003-01-31 19:08:04 |
| Message-ID: | 006801c2c95c$15a208b0$1a01000a@rduadunstan2 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Copeland" <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
> I'm confused as to whether you are being sarcastic or truly seem to
> think there is a distinction here. Simple question, does MySQL require
> the cygwin dll's (or statically linked to) to run?
>
> If the answer is yes, then there is little question that they are as
> "emulated" as is the current PostgreSQL/Win32 effort.
>
> Care to expand on exactly what you believe the distinction is? ...or
> did I miss the humor boat? :(
I just installed it (their latest gama), to see what was there (and
uninstalled it straight away ;-). There was a cygwinb19.dll (I think that's
what it was called) installed.
In any case, if we are talking about "industrial strength", is this the
comparison we should be using? ;-)
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Curtis Faith | 2003-01-31 19:18:29 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
| Previous Message | Greg A. Woods | 2003-01-31 19:07:09 | Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS |