Re: CoC [Final v2]

Joshua for the record I am not upset about raising this issue.

However I am concerned that it is becoming counter-productive.

It is taking too much time away from the real work and aim of this forum.

Otherwise it is necessary.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
Sent: 24 January 2016 17:31
To: Geoff Winkless; FarjadFarid(ChkNet); Postgres General
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] CoC [Final v2]

On 01/24/2016 07:36 AM, Geoff Winkless wrote:

> We'll just need you and Dave to sign a legally binding contract that
> you will provide indemnity for any and all actions that might come
> about as a result, in all locations worldwide. Oh, and you'll need to
> pay the legal fees for lawyers (your own and ours) to ensure that it
> actually does that and that you either have the funds to cover it or
> you're paying for indemnity insurance that does cover it (no matter
> what happens or including whether the action is on behalf of or
> against one of the core team), and to advise on the exact liabilities
> and responsibilities of whoever implements the CoC.
>
> I'm sure that'll be fine, yes?

Enough.

Sarcasm is not productive.

This is a difficult topic. A good portion of this community doesn't want a CoC at all. A good portion are upset with me for even bringing it up.
This is something that I brought up in protest because I believe that it is crucial to the growth of this community. Remember that I don't want one either but sometimes we do things we don't want to do. We still do them in a professional and productive way because that is who we are.

If you are participating in this thread, be productive. If you are going to be sarcastic and not helpful, get off the thread.

Do not turn our community into a SJW fight. We are better than that.

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.