| From: | "Pavlo Baron" <pb(at)pbit(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO question |
| Date: | 2001-12-28 09:15:59 |
| Message-ID: | 003301c18f80$44489d80$6500a8c0@bw1 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian:
> Actually, the bigest problem with these small items is not the coding
> but making a patch everyone likes (at least for me). :-)
ok, but what's the exact process of integrating patches made by new
contributers (or smb. who tries to become a contributer, smb. like me ,-) )?
I made (and remade, thank you Tom) a patch for "Allow INSERT INTO my_table
VALUES (a, b, c, DEFAULT, x, y, z, ...)" from the TODO list being a small
nice item. How do I know if it's been accepted? I explicitely wanted to
begin with such small items, because: what looks small'n'easy for you guys
would take some time for me to implement, and if I've got it after I jogged
through the whole parser, maybe it would look small'n'easy for me, too.
rgds
Pavlo Baron
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-12-28 15:07:12 | Re: TODO question |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-12-28 05:24:23 | Re: Performance problem with large insert statements |