From: | "Mitch Vincent" <mvincent(at)cablespeed(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Philip" <philj80(at)netscape(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Does Postgresql 7.1.x Still Have 8K Maximum Field Size? |
Date: | 2001-09-15 13:25:00 |
Message-ID: | 002301c13de9$d23f90a0$a2625dd8@mitch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
The 8k (well, BLCKSZ limit) has been eliminated for quite some time now..
-Mitch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip" <philj80(at)netscape(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 6:57 AM
Subject: [GENERAL] Does Postgresql 7.1.x Still Have 8K Maximum Field Size?
> Hello all.
>
> I will be creating one of my first web applications and would like to use
Postgresql as the database on a Red Hat 6.2 or 7.1 system with Apache and
either ColdFusion or PHP.
>
> Anyway, the application will have a text field where employees can update
their progress on assigned tasks. By the time a task is completed, the
field may exceed 8k. I am not a person who likes to compile from tarball's
because training non-Linux experienced fellow system administrators to use
RPMs is enough. Updates are easier as well.
>
> The question: Is it possible to have a text field greater than 8k but
only using RPMs -- not compiling and/or chaining via a separate table
(breaking something into 8k chunks)? If so, how?
>
> Any assistance you can provide is appreciated. Thanks.
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas.
Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop(at)Netscape!
http://shopnow.netscape.com/
>
> Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com/
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Culley Harrelson | 2001-09-15 14:27:58 | Encoding |
Previous Message | speedboy | 2001-09-15 11:15:38 | Re: Does Postgresql 7.1.x Still Have 8K Maximum Field |