Re: Notices for redundant operations

From: "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Notices for redundant operations
Date: 2003-09-06 13:46:33
Message-ID: 002001c3747d$4c8e15e0$e86e0b3e@mm.eutelsat.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > I found a few notices and warnings that inform you that the command you
> > are executing has no effect because the object is already in the state
you
> > want it. I think these are useless, and there is also some
inconsistency.
> > Does someone want to defend keeping them?
>
> Do you think the commands should just silently do nothing? That seems
> strange to me. I like giving a NOTICE (not WARNING though, those guys
> should be changed).

Of course not but I personally prefer have back a normal response.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marek Lewczuk 2003-09-06 13:55:12 Needed function IF(expr, expr, expr)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-09-06 13:14:57 Re: [PATCHES] Warning for missing createlang