Re: Pre-allocation of shared memory ...

Alan Cox has written to me thus:

> It got dropped for RH9 and some errata kernels because of clashes between
> the old stuff and the rmap vm and other weird RH patches

andrew

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Kurt Roeckx" <Q(at)ping(dot)be>; "Matthew Kirkwood"
<matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>; <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pre-allocation of shared memory ...

> I know he does - *but* I think it has probably been wiped out by accident
> somewhere along the line (like when they went to 2.4.20?)
>
> Here's what's in RH sources - tell me after you look that I am looking in
> the wrong place. (Or did RH get cute and decide to do this only for the AS
> product?)
>