| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: postmaster uses more CPU in 18 beta1 with io_method=io_uring |
| Date: | 2025-06-30 16:27:10 |
| Message-ID: | zvel3aoq2lzzmz6wstta64lpmoyd6lua53ylllx4ntgrcxikas@zoxf42dpci6v |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-06-05 14:32:10 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2025-06-05 12:47:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > > I think this is a big enough pitfall that it's, obviously assuming the patch
> > > has a sensible complexity, worth fixing this in 18. RMT, anyone, what do you
> > > think?
> >
> > Let's see the patch ... but yeah, I'd rather not ship 18 like this.
>
> I've attached a first draft.
>
> I can't make heads or tails of the ordering in configure.ac, so the function
> test is probably in the wrong place.
Any comments on that patch? I'd hoped for some review comments... Unless I'll
hear otherwise, I'll just do a bit more polish and push..
Greetings,
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-06-30 16:37:53 | Re: A concurrent VACUUM FULL? |
| Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-06-30 15:56:36 | Re: pg_get_multixact_members not documented |