| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st |
| Date: | 2026-06-02 18:43:31 |
| Message-ID: | zrsylrq26izyr4iddtjevss2fkhjl3l57rccbpuunzb4xs2dah@hbrytl4rrnnm |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2026-06-02 20:08:17 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 01.06.26 23:57, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Attached is an large incremental patch onto Bilal's version:
>
> This looks good to me.
Cool.
> (I suppose the 0005 patch was just for testing.
Correct. Things just take too long to iterate otherwise.
> The 0004 patch looks ok but
> could use some explanation in both the commit message and the code.)
It's also not really for commit at this point. I think we should do it, but it
to help more locally than on CI.
> + # FIXME: Should we also run on PRs?
>
> I don't know why we would, since we don't use them.
From what I can tell the workflow of plenty folks during their own development
is to open PRs in their own repo. I don't really see a downside to also
running on PRs, so I'm inclined to do so. Won't hurt us...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2026-06-02 18:46:52 | Re: injection_points: Switch wait/wakeup to use atomics rather than latches |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2026-06-02 18:38:37 | Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st |