Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes
Date: 2026-04-19 18:04:34
Message-ID: zdlyd6k6tto55tgn26wp5oeytmeipihn2ika4olm43kdgpxkhr@lsfb4zgo4oxq
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2026-04-19 13:53:08 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The text I put in the wiki, which I have followed for years, says:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Creating_Major_Release_Notes
> Performance improvements are mentioned in the release notes if
> they are user-visible (e.g., new syntax) or significant enough
> to enable new workloads.
>
> I didn't think +12-17% for an index build would enable new workloads.
> If you want to relitigate that, you are welcome to do so. If this is
> changed, it has to be done so consistently, not just for this item.

Just about everyone has disagreed vehemently with you about this, in every of
the last 5 releases or so. I don't think it's ok that you continue to ignore
that.

I find this policy so depressing that I stopped even opening the release
notes, just to preserve whatever semblance of sanity I possess. I'm know I'm
not alone in that.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul A Jungwirth 2026-04-19 18:07:47 Re: DELETE/UPDATE FOR PORTION OF with rule system is not working
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2026-04-19 17:53:08 Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes