| From: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta |
| Date: | 2010-05-07 23:09:36 |
| Message-ID: | z2se94e14cd1005071609id015a4t42da90684bf13270@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/5/6 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> OK, seems people like pg_upgrade, but do we call it "pgupgrade" or
>> "pg_upgrade"?
>
pg_upgrade sounds good. I just bet that some users will want it to
upgrade their postgresql from 9.0.0 to 9.0.1..
> The latter. The former is unreadable.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
--
Cédric Villemain
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2010-05-07 23:32:59 | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-07 22:26:22 | Re: beta to release |