Re: Autonomous transaction

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Loïc Vaumerel <shefla(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autonomous transaction
Date: 2010-04-05 16:11:13
Message-ID: z2r3073cc9b1004050911v171df417yb7fd9675af9bcc98@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Loïc Vaumerel <shefla(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
[...]
> All solutions I found are working the same way : they use dblink.
> I consider these solution more as handiwork than a clean solution.
> I am a little bit concerned about side effects as dblink were not intially
> designed for this.
>

the only side effect i can think of is that you will use another
connection slot (that's because dblink will stablish a new connection)

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-04-05 16:29:49 Show schema name on REINDEX DATABASE
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-04-05 16:01:19 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per