From: | jearl(at)bullysports(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Response from MySql AB (Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. |
Date: | 2003-10-09 18:57:53 |
Message-ID: | y8vudyry.fsf@bullysports.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:52:36AM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:
>> Fact: If you write your application to work with ODBC -> MySQL
>> connectivity, you can write a closed source app and sell it for money and
>
> Fact: nobody's ever tested any of this in court, so you're basically
> risking it.
>
> I think if people want legal advice about the status of MySQL's
> claims about GPL, they'd best consult a lawyer who knows a lot about
> software licenses.
This is especially true considering the fact that the Free Software
Foundation would *love* for MySQL AB to be right on this one. The
interpretation of the GPL the FSF forwards is the one that they feel
that they can safely defend in a court of law. However, if there was
a precedent set for MySQL AB's interpretation that would suit them
right down to the ground.
Jason
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-10-09 19:01:57 | Re: Table partitioning for maximum speed? |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-10-09 18:43:17 | Re: Parent Id |