Re: Using 7.1rc1 under RH 6.2

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: "Arsalan Zaidi" <azaidi(at)directi(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using 7.1rc1 under RH 6.2
Date: 2001-05-21 17:38:46
Message-ID: xuywv7aob4p.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:

> On Monday 21 May 2001 07:46, Arsalan Zaidi wrote:
> > We tried the RPM under RH 6.2 and it would unpack, saying we needed this or
> > that or the other... A whole bunch of dependencies.
>
> > I just want to be sure... there's no compelling reason to use RH 7.x
> > (basically any new distribution with newer libraries) right? Are there any
> > subtle problems we'd face if we continue using this setup?
>
> RedHat 7.1 is a substantial upgrade for more than one reason. Performance is
> better, and stability (at least for me) has been just as good.

The 2.4 kernels make sure that fdatasync() works properly, which could
improve performance in certain scenarious quite a bit.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-21 17:41:50 Re: Is stats update during COPY IN really a good idea?
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-05-21 17:37:58 RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem