| From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
| Date: | 2000-10-10 21:29:11 |
| Message-ID: | xuyog0so060.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> > OTOH, Red Hat, Inc. employs most of the gcc developers and by far the
> > most GDB developers(80-90% of commits). There are still mechanisms in
> > place to hinder that we have any sort of control over these...
>
> What sort of mechanisms? Perhaps we need to borrow some ideas from
> your situation.
Steering committees, where one entitity (university, company etc) are
restricted to a maximum quota of members.
http://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-10 21:34:49 | Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR |
| Previous Message | Martin Jacobs | 2000-10-10 21:25:11 | Re: Regression tests of plain 7.0.2 fails |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-10 21:39:48 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-10 21:25:08 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |