From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=d8d?=) |
---|---|
To: | Marc SCHAEFER <schaefer(at)alphanet(dot)ch> |
Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Brian C(dot) Doyle" <bcdoyle(at)mindspring(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |
Date: | 2000-11-30 21:11:39 |
Message-ID: | xuyofyxupv8.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
Marc SCHAEFER <schaefer(at)alphanet(dot)ch> writes:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > Note that this is a Linux limitation ... and even then, I'm not quite sure
> > how accurate that is anymore ... the *BSDs have supported >2gb file
> > systems for ages now, and, since IBM supports Linux, I'd be shocked if
> > there was a 2GB limit on memory, considering alot of IBMs servers support
> > up to 4 or 8GB of RAM ...
>
> Linux 2.2.x on ix86 only supports files upto 2 GB.
This support has been backported as is available in some kernels
shipped with Red Hat Linux, and has been so for some time. Possibly
others.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Lang | 2000-11-30 21:15:44 | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database - more info |
Previous Message | Dale Anderson | 2000-11-30 20:54:26 | Re: Table & Column descriptions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2000-11-30 22:35:36 | Re: I get an error with Foreign Keys |
Previous Message | Martin A. Marques | 2000-11-30 20:34:08 | Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? |