Re: File system performance and pg_xlog

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: File system performance and pg_xlog
Date: 2001-05-07 16:46:48
Message-ID: xuyae4pxg1z.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> That is a major issue for people running performance tests. For
> example, XFS may be slow on 2.2 kernels but not 2.4 kernels.

XFS is 2.4 only, AFAIK - even the installer modifications SGI did to
Red Hat Linux 7 (which is shipped with a 2.2 kernel) includes
installing a 2.4pre kernel, AFAIR.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-05-07 16:56:03 Re: typo in psql's help
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-07 16:45:47 Re: elog(LOG), elog(DEBUG)