Re: Adding foreign key performance

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding foreign key performance
Date: 2003-10-28 19:22:04
Message-ID: x7ekwxdv6r.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>>>>> "J" == Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> writes:

J> And this leads to the place we'd get a huge benefit: Restoring
J> backups.. If there were some way to bump up sort_mem while doing
J> the restore.. things would be much more pleasant. [Although, even

There was a rather substantial thread on this about the time when
7.4b1 was released.

J> better would be to disable FK stuff while restoring a backup and
J> assume the backup is "sane"] How we'd go about doing that is the
J> subject of much debate.

If you're restoring from a pg_dump -Fc (compressed dump) it already
happens for you. The indexes and foreign keys are not added until the
very end, from what I recall.

J> Perhaps add the functionality to pg_restore? ie, pg_restore -s
J> 256MB mybackup.db? It would just end up issuing a set
J> sort_mem=256000..

This was essentially my proposal, though I had better speed
enhancement by increasing the number of checkpoint buffers.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff 2003-10-28 19:25:24 Re: Adding foreign key performance
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2003-10-28 19:18:02 Re: Very Poor Insert Performance