Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
Date: 2004-02-11 21:27:51
Message-ID: x74qtx9ui0.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "JG" == John Gibson <gib(at)edgate(dot)com> writes:

JG> Hi, all.
JG> I need to upgrade my dual Xeon PostgreSQL engine.

JG> Assuming similar memory and disk sub-systems, I am considering a Quad
JG> Xeon system vs. a Dual Itanium for PostgreSQL. I believe that the

Save the money from the dual itanium or quad xeon and buy a dual xeon
but faster disks with a larger cache in the RAID controller, and
perhaps a dedicated RAID controller for the disk set that holds the
write-ahead log.

You're sure to find that you saturate the disk system faster than you
fill up even one CPU, let alone 4.

I assume that the box will be running *only* the database and any
other applications will run elsewhere.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rick Gigger 2004-02-11 21:40:06 Re: DB cache size strategies
Previous Message Ian Harding 2004-02-11 21:20:21 Re: sybase->postgresql