Erich <hh(at)cyberpass(dot)net> writes:
> What an insulting article! They say that PostgreSQL is "equal" in
> efficiency to MS SQL. The rest of it was pretty good, though.
And Oracle. I would love to see more "neutral" performance tests between
databases though. I suppose MS SQL could be could good for somethings as it
is based on the code bought from Sybase.
Still, the effiency can be a lot of things. I like PostgreSQL mainly
because I can develop and deploy applications in a cost efficient way with
it. But this equation will ofcourse depend on your organizations demands
and skills.
Regards,
Gunnar