Re: Problem migrating dump to latest CVS snapshot.

From: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem migrating dump to latest CVS snapshot.
Date: 2001-03-23 01:17:03
Message-ID: x6g0g51dyo.fsf@thor.candleweb.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no> writes:
> > ERROR: copy: line 154391, Bad timestamp external representation '2000-10-24 15:14:60.00+02'
>
> BTW, did your original data contain any fractional-second timestamps?
> I'm wondering if the original value might have been something like
> 2000-10-24 15:14:59.999
> in which case sprintf's roundoff of the seconds field to %.2f format
> would've been enough to do the damage.

What do you mean by original value ? The value we have in the production
database ? If so, that shows up as 2000-10-24 15:14:60.00+02 independent of
what platform my client is running on. The production platform was as I
mentioned Solaris 2.7.

The value was generated at the time of a given web request by a Java
servlet and inserted into the database using JDBC. The timestamp in Java is
the number of milliseconds since epoch, so yes it is quite probable that it
contained a fractional second timestamp ;-)

But the problem here then might be with the Solaris 2.7 platform and not
Redhat Linux 6.1 if I am interpreting this right ???

Regards,

Gunnar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message will trillich 2001-03-23 01:19:02 Re: Re: Birthday comparisons
Previous Message Limin Liu 2001-03-23 01:16:50 SPI example does not work for 7.1beta4

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-23 01:24:36 Re: [HACKERS] SPI example does not work for 7.1beta4
Previous Message Limin Liu 2001-03-23 01:16:50 SPI example does not work for 7.1beta4