Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Acucobol, ODBC and Postgres

From: Jonathan Foy <thefoy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Acucobol, ODBC and Postgres
Date: 2010-04-07 21:05:16
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-odbc
I'm using (or think I am) the latest psqlODBC download from the postgresql
website.  8.04.0200.  It was compiled and then linked into runcbl via the
ACUSQL_ODBC_LIB variable, which then gets passed up the chain, in the
Makefile (for runcbl).  Is this not the correct way to do it?

I'm under the impression that I'm bypassing unixODBC, but I am fairly new
with this (cobol/odbc).  So I could be wrong.

ODBCng is no longer being developed, I'm not sure that that's the route I
want to take for the future.  And convincing Higher Ups to go the commercial
route would be difficult...

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Jonah H. Harris <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Jonathan Foy <thefoy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm trying to configure the postgres odbc driver with our Acucobol
>> application (5.2 and 8.1), and was hoping that someone out there might have
>> some experience with this.
> About two years ago I was working on a project which used Postgres via ODBC
> with both ACUCOBOL and Micro Focus.  Which ODBC driver are you using?  You
> should try ODBCng (
> Also, you may want to try/consider using the commercial PG ODBC driver from
> DataDirect (
> --
> Jonah H. Harris
> Blog:

In response to

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Goutham Jalakam - ERS, HCL TechDate: 2010-04-08 07:28:01
Subject: Regarding sinsle quotes
Previous:From: Jonathan FoyDate: 2010-04-07 20:55:45
Subject: Re: Acucobol, ODBC and Postgres

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group