| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: index prefetching |
| Date: | 2025-07-16 21:16:04 |
| Message-ID: | wm7gezcte7t6pyj2e5dtb4xhjwze5spizdtilhr5wqokb5ante@kesy76xnwq2q |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-07-16 16:54:06 -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 3:40 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > As a first thing I just wanted to get a feel for the improvements we can get.
> > I had a scale 5 tpch already loaded, so I ran a bogus query on that to see.
>
> Cool.
>
> > Test:
> >
> > Peter's:
>
> To be clear, the "complex" patch is still almost all Tomas' work -- at
> least right now. I'd like to do a lot more work on this project,
> though.
Indeed. Sorry - what I intended but failed to write was "the approach that
Peter is arguing for"...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-07-16 21:22:56 | Re: small fix for pg_overexplain docs |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-07-16 21:01:16 | Re: index prefetching |