From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "bob lapique"<lapique(at)chez(dot)com>, "pgsql-sql" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sharing data accross several databases |
Date: | 2002-01-22 23:05:33 |
Message-ID: | web-673532@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Bob,
> I am designing 2 databases :
> - the 1st relates to flasks
> - the 2nd relates to cylinders
>
> Both flasks and cylinders will be shipped accross the
> world and I need to keep track of check out dates,
> shipping method, destination, etc. These data will be of
> the same type for both databases.
So, why are you designing two seperate databases? It seems to me that
you only need one database, with relevant tables carrying a "Type"
column of "Flask" or "Cylinder". Seperate databases will give you all
kinds of headaches you don't need.
> Questions :
> -----------
> 1) Is a 3rd database the solution ?
No. One, single, database is the solution.
> 2) I would like to keep on using foreign keys (e.g.
> between a shipped item and the destination location)
PostgreSQL does not permit access of multiple databases from SQL (this
was a design decision, based on the project's interpretation of the
SQL92 standard). If you pursue you current approach, you will be
forced to use middleware (such as JSP or J2EE or Perl::DBI) to access
both of your databases at once ... considerable trouble for no
benefit.
-Josh Berkus
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | chester c young | 2002-01-22 23:29:09 | Re: sharing data accross several databases |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-01-22 16:12:31 | Re: list triggers ? |