| From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jean-Christophe Boggio <cat(at)thefreecat(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Optimization with dates |
| Date: | 2001-11-14 00:19:13 |
| Message-ID: | web-505462@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Jean-Christophe,
> Aggregate (cost=256546.78..256546.78 rows=1 width=0)
> -> Seq Scan on gains (cost=0.00..250627.68 rows=2367640 width=0)
>
> whereas :
Hmmm... if the number of rows is actually accurate (2M out of 10M in the
last 30 days) then a Seq Scan seems like a good plan to me. If the
numbers aren't accurate, it's time to run a VACUUM ANALYZE.
Regardless, if you're actually querying for 2M recordsets, you'd better
throw some hardware at the problem, and learn the .conf parameters.
-Josh
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jason Earl | 2001-11-14 00:44:00 | Re: Optimization with dates |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-11-14 00:17:06 | Re: Optimization with dates |