Re: Sort time

From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pginfo <pginfo(at)t1(dot)unisoftbg(dot)com>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sort time
Date: 2002-11-15 17:12:55
Message-ID: web-1827471@davinci.ethosmedia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Pginfo,

> Sort (cost=100922.53..100922.53 rows=22330 width=215) (actual
> time=109786.23..110231.74 rows=679743 loops=1)
> -> Hash Join (cost=9153.28..99309.52 rows=22330 width=215)
> (actual
> time=12572.01..56330.28 rows=679743 loops=1)
> -> Hash Join (cost=2271.05..91995.05 rows=30620 width=198)
> (actual
> time=7082.66..36482.57 rows=679743 loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on a_sklad s (cost=0.00..84181.91
> rows=687913
> width=111) (actual time=6812.81..23085.36 rows=679743 loops=1)
> -> Hash (cost=2256.59..2256.59 rows=5784 width=87)
> (actual
> time=268.05..268.05 rows=0 loops=1)
> -> Hash Join (cost=2.52..2256.59 rows=5784
> width=87)
> (actual time=125.25..255.48 rows=5784 loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on a_nomen n
> (cost=0.00..2152.84
> rows=5784 width=74) (actual time=120.63..216.93 rows=5784 loops=1)
> -> Hash (cost=2.42..2.42 rows=42
> width=13)
> (actual time=0.57..0.57 rows=0 loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on a_med med
> (cost=0.00..2.42
> rows=42 width=13) (actual time=0.24..0.46 rows=42 loops=1)
> -> Hash (cost=6605.19..6605.19 rows=110819 width=17)
> (actual
> time=5485.90..5485.90 rows=0 loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on a_doc d (cost=0.00..6605.19
> rows=110819
> width=17) (actual time=61.18..5282.99 rows=109788 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 110856.36 msec

Pardon me if we've been over this ground, but that's a *lot* of seq
scans for this query. It seems odd that there's not *one* index scan.

Have you tried indexing *all* of the following fields?
S.FID
N.OSN_MED
S.IDS_NUM
N.IDS
S.IDS_DOC
D.IDS
(check to avoid duplicate indexes. don't forget to VACUUM ANALYZE
after you index)

-Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-11-15 17:22:32 Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Previous Message pginfo 2002-11-15 16:22:28 Re: Sort time