Robert,
> If the functions can fire as there creator instead of there caller,
> then
> I would think as long as the creator has insert/update views on the
> base
> table, you should be able to do updateable rules and give only
> permissions to the view for the caller. (Though maybe you have to use
> triggers rather than rules to do this?) Does that sound right?
I don't know. Can you test it?
-Josh