Re: The mystery of concurrent access

From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The mystery of concurrent access
Date: 2001-10-05 20:26:58
Message-ID: web-142736@davinci.ethosmedia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

P.V.,

> When 2 processes/people are simultaneously working on a table
>
> * does Postgres automatically enforce some sort of locking?
> * do the changes made by process A become visible to process B
> immediately
> (of course, the result of a SELECT wouldn't change dynamically, but
> suppose
> process B did another SELECT, would it access process A's records?)

Please read:

http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?mvcc.html

-Josh

______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 2 bytes
unknown_filename text/plain 2 bytes
unknown_filename text/plain 2 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Earl 2001-10-05 21:52:05 Re: The mystery of concurrent access
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-10-05 19:08:34 Re: How to find out that a record has been updated