From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure |
Date: | 2025-06-16 15:11:29 |
Message-ID: | vzq44lsusum5fcjc3tksg4weu5ihfnbpwnno4d5n3orvw4cxp6@vtrmkmrclm2r |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-06-16 14:11:39 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> One more update: with the proposed patch (memory barrier before
> `ConditionVariableBroadcast` in `pgaio_io_process_completion`
I don't see how that barrier could be required for correctness -
ConditionVariableBroadcast() is a barrier itself (as the comment above the
call notes, too).
On 2025-06-15 14:48:43 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> Also I think that replacing bitfields with `uint8` and may be even with
> `int`, is good idea at least to avoids false sharing.
I don't think there's false sharing here. And even if there were, the
granularity at which false sharing occurs is a cache line size, so either 64
or 128 byte.
I unfortunately can't repro this issue so far. I don't think it's the same
problem as my patch fixes, so I'll push my patch. How exactly did you
reproduce the probelm?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-06-16 15:18:41 | Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data |
Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2025-06-16 15:08:32 | Re: psql: tab-completion support for COPY ... TO/FROM STDIN, STDOUT, and PROGRAM |