| From: | Michael Graff <explorer(at)flame(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | IPv6 (what ISC is running) |
| Date: | 2003-05-13 23:26:54 |
| Message-ID: | v6d6imcts1.fsf@kechara.flame.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Here's the patch, with the regression tests, documentation changes,
etc.
I still have one data type for both families, since that just makes
sense to me. If this must be reworked (even though there is a
family() function included) it probably won't happen anytime soon.
Can we get this reviewed and hopefully committed if the changes are
acceptable?
Thanks,
--Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pgsql-inet6.diff | text/x-patch | 61.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-13 23:37:36 | Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-05-13 23:21:58 | Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs |