| From: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com |
| Cc: | johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Transaction Question |
| Date: | 2003-12-04 20:27:39 |
| Message-ID: | v65vsvgn9pm8v0ieidujq6s5n80b2r94sd@email.aon.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:56:33 -0000 (GMT), "John Sidney-Woollett"
<johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com> wrote:
>It would be nice if nested transactions could be (optionally) decoupled
>from their enclosing transaction.
While I see your point how this could be useful for certain use cases,
unfortunately I don't have any idea how it could be implemented with
respect to MVCC.
Servus
Manfred
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-12-04 20:43:08 | Re: query and pg_dump problem on my postgresql 6.5.3/Redhat |
| Previous Message | Doug Christie | 2003-12-04 20:26:37 | unsubscribe |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Naeslund(t) | 2003-12-04 20:30:02 | Re: PostgreSQL 7.3.4 gets killed by SIG_KILL [SOLVED] |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-12-04 20:27:22 | Re: tuning questions |