From: | "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
Cc: | "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture |
Date: | 1999-06-14 00:39:23 |
Message-ID: | v04020a15b389fe635705@[137.78.84.130] |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
At 1:47 AM -0700 6/12/99, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>I have tried 6.4beta4 on NetBSD 1.3.3/m68k. It failed while running
>initdb:
>
>Creating template database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/template1
>
>FATAL: s_lock(001bbea3) at bufmgr.c:1992, stuck spinlock. Aborting.
>
>FATAL: s_lock(001bbea3) at bufmgr.c:1992, stuck spinlock. Aborting.
>
>Seems something really bad is going on...
That certainly seems bad enough, but I did not see that problem. Are you
talking about way back when 6.4 was still in beta? Or did you mean 6.5?
As I tried to post earlier: when I built 6.4.2 using the patches it built
fine and initdb worked. Most regression tests seemed ok-ish, but one of
them noticed that 'now' - 'current' was more than 200 days.
I had a problem building 6.5, but I think it was related to my
configuration rather than to Postgres.
Signature failed Preliminary Design Review.
Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated.
h(dot)b(dot)hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henry B. Hotz | 1999-06-14 00:50:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-06-13 20:26:42 | Re: [HACKERS] new patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henry B. Hotz | 1999-06-14 00:50:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-06-13 20:09:42 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY bug? |