Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-04-11 17:57:45
Message-ID: v04020a01b519152a0e4f@[] (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
At 7:27 AM -0700 4/11/00, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > Considering that there is up to this day no terminally universal way to
>> > pronounce 'Linux' (unless you know Swedish :), I don't think that's worth
>> > worrying about. Personally, I find PostgreSQL very pronouncable though.
>> Me too: Post-Gres-Q-L ..
>Added to first FAQ item.

Maybe I'm too late, but can I cast a vote for the Southern California

I regard the switch to SQL query language as a historical artifact which
neither requires ongoing emphasis, nor justifies disinheriting ourselves
from our historical roots.  We can easily support the domain
name as an alias for the same machines as, and likewise in
the .com domain.  I presume UCB already has the trademark for the postgres

Signature failed Preliminary Design Review.
Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated.
h(dot)b(dot)hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-04-11 18:14:40
Subject: Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-04-11 17:33:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bugs: Programming Language Functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group