Re: JDBC transactions

From: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC transactions
Date: 1998-01-07 22:40:46
Message-ID: v03110704b0d9b4e45e9e@[147.233.55.121]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

At 18:05 +0200 on 7/1/98, Peter T Mount wrote:

> PS: in the current implementation, con.setAutoCommit(false) itself
> initiates the transaction, not the next sql call.

Ah, good of you to reveal this! This would mean that I would have to call
it again if I want another transaction to start after I've committed the
first.

Herouth

--
Herouth Maoz, B.Sc. Work: herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il
Home: herutma(at)telem(dot)openu(dot)co(dot)il
HOME PAGE: http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~herouth/
Internet technical assistant Open University, Telem Project

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter T Mount 1998-01-08 12:59:34 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: JDBC transactions
Previous Message Palle Girgensohn 1998-01-07 19:16:09 Re: [QUESTIONS] pgaccess (libpgtcl) on Solaris?