Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS

From: lynch(at)lscorp(dot)com (Richard Lynch)
To: Bruce Tong <zztong(at)laxmi(dot)ev(dot)net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS
Date: 1998-06-04 22:57:13
Message-ID: v02140b0fb19c8ed0a44b@[207.152.64.133]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 4:51 PM 6/4/98, Bruce Tong wrote:

>The docs say in a paragraph of text use "createuser" to create a new
>postgres user. Questions which came to my mind, and which I have
>mostly resolved all had to do with finding what is a good convention
>for creating these users and what types of access require a user? Does a
>person connecting via MS Access need to be a user. Can multiple people
>share and is that a good idea? Is it a good idea to use the same name as
>the login name, or is there a reason to use another name? Oddly enough,
>the single most time consuming thing to figure out was that there was an
>account on my system called "postgres" which had to be used to issue the
>command.

That paragraph confused me 'cuz I didn't know it was a unix prompt command
versus and sql query versus a psql monitor command...

Perhaps some consistent way of labeling WHERE a command was issued would
also be good.

--
--
-- "TANSTAAFL" Rich lynch(at)lscorp(dot)com

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Olivier 1998-06-04 23:22:58 (no subject)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-06-04 22:09:55 Re: [GENERAL] Not about LOGOs this time...