From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | "tempinout(at)ukr(dot)net" <tempinout(at)ukr(dot)net> |
Cc: | "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: error |
Date: | 2019-03-29 10:49:33 |
Message-ID: | uuXA199zUrSbtxMY48F--fwKhEviOZCZvWECaZIfCpTGQAZbbLBx4mZjiPCyjXpdZg3FQIEg6g7TlsVhuJXX5Dj8BqYHD93akGWTCqrdp_s=@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thursday, March 28, 2019 3:44 PM, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/xfunc-sql.html
> Description:
>
> > hello
> > i've descovered a small error - instead of integer should be numeric
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/xfunc-sql.html
This was fixed in 0332993c4e14f13b211f41535f77aadb305fd354 but wasn't
backported, hence why it's still integer in 9.6 but numeric in 10 and
onwards.
cheers ./daniel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2019-03-31 14:23:46 | Responsive images in pgweb docs |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-03-28 20:23:08 | Re: First SVG graphic |