Re: planner and join type mismatches

From: "Jim Wilson" <jimw(at)kelcomaine(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: planner and join type mismatches
Date: 2004-01-14 15:46:18
Message-ID: twig.1074095178.64519@kelcomaine.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> said:

> "Jim Wilson" <jimw(at)kelcomaine(dot)com> writes:
> > Re: tip 9 :-). In 7.3.5 is it possible that the planner is finding a type
> > mismatch when there isn't one, resulting in a seq scan being selected?
>
> When you gave no details, how is anyone to know? For questions like
> this, you need to post the table definitions, the exact query, and the
> results of EXPLAIN ANALYZE on that query. BTW, pgsql-performance is a
> more appropriate list than -general for such questions.
>
> regards, tom lane

My apologies. I think you did answer my question though, that there isn't a
well known problem as described (in it's general scope). As soon as I get a
chance I will put together a test case and post the issue to psql-performance.

Best,

Jim Wilson

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keith C. Perry 2004-01-14 15:56:01 Re: Best practice? Web application: single PostgreSQL
Previous Message Mike Nolan 2004-01-14 15:45:30 Schemas not created on restore