From: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP |
Date: | 2005-09-29 06:50:30 |
Message-ID: | thhal-0NycXBFmg8bQ2+Jr46bQjc5xXqCWgs/@mailblocks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I've installed PostgreSQL 8.1-beta2 as a service on my Windows-XP box.
It runs fine but I get repeated messages like this in the log:
2005-09-29 00:41:09 FATAL: could not duplicate socket 1880 for use
in backend: error code 10038
and for each message printed, a new postgres process is created. To make
things worse, those processes do not die when I stop the service.
I use sysinternals tcpview to monitor my sockets. I know that no other
process is using 1880. Each started postgres process will occupy two,
seemingly random ports that apparently form a loop somehow. This is a
typical entry:
<non-existent>:3136 TCP 127.0.0.1:1554 127.0.0.1:1555 ESTABLISHED
<non-existent>:3136 TCP 127.0.0.1:1555 127.0.0.1:1554 ESTABLISHED
The weird thing is that there is no process with pid 3136 (hence the
name <non-existent>). There is a postgres process with another pid in my
process listing. If I kill that, the <non-existstent> entries go away.
Looks like pid 3136 is talking to itself. A pipe() followed by failure
to start the new process perhaps?
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-09-29 07:07:59 | Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-09-29 06:38:47 | Re: Added documentation about caching, reliability |