Re: Question regarding dynamic_library_path

From: "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question regarding dynamic_library_path
Date: 2004-06-09 14:37:56
Message-ID: thhal-09LiiAT//Tdswk0KNg0hL0AcT0EdiTI@mailblocks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I agree. I wasn't aware of that restriction.

regards,

Thomas Hallgren

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 15:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Question regarding dynamic_library_path

> "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> writes:
> > And only the super user can use directory components in a module name?
>
> Only superusers can create C functions in the first place, so quibbling
> about what paths they can use doesn't seem that useful ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Honza Pazdziora 2004-06-09 14:43:38 Re: [HACKERS] Refined LC_COLLATE or multiple database clusters?
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2004-06-09 14:23:19 Re: Improving postgresql.conf