| From: | 陈列行 <2320415112(at)qq(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Redundant outer DISTINCT adds Sort and Unique above EXCEPT |
| Date: | 2026-08-17 08:14:20 |
| Message-ID: | tencent_E960DF95B08E1C405C12BBCB485282D6D209@qq.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
## Description
This issue concerns an outer `DISTINCT` applied to an `EXCEPT` result.
Non-`ALL` `EXCEPT` already removes duplicates, so applying `DISTINCT` again
is semantically redundant. PostgreSQL retains the additional operation.
### Expected Behaviour
PostgreSQL should use the duplicate-free property of `EXCEPT` and eliminate
the outer `DISTINCT`. The original and simplified forms should receive
equivalent plans.
### Actual Behaviour
The outer `DISTINCT` adds `Sort -> Unique` above `HashSetOp Except`. With
two 500,000-row inputs and 250,000 result rows, five-run medians were
184.393 ms with the redundant operation and 181.401 ms without it,
approximately 1.6% slower. This timing difference is small enough to overlap
runtime variation, but the extra plan operators are deterministic.
## How to repeat
```sql
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS except_distinct_lhs;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS except_distinct_rhs;
CREATE TABLE except_distinct_lhs (v INTEGER NOT NULL);
CREATE TABLE except_distinct_rhs (v INTEGER NOT NULL);
INSERT INTO except_distinct_lhs
SELECT g FROM generate_series(1, 500000) AS g;
INSERT INTO except_distinct_rhs
SELECT g FROM generate_series(250001, 750000) AS g;
ANALYZE except_distinct_lhs;
ANALYZE except_distinct_rhs;
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, VERBOSE, SETTINGS, TIMING OFF)
SELECT DISTINCT v
FROM (
SELECT v FROM except_distinct_lhs
EXCEPT
SELECT v FROM except_distinct_rhs
) AS set_result;
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, VERBOSE, SETTINGS, TIMING OFF)
SELECT v
FROM (
SELECT v FROM except_distinct_lhs
EXCEPT
SELECT v FROM except_distinct_rhs
) AS set_result;
```
Both queries return the same 250,000 rows. The characteristic plans are:
```text
with DISTINCT: Unique -> Sort -> HashSetOp Except
without: HashSetOp Except
```
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | 陈列行 | 2026-08-17 08:16:39 | redundant double negation prevents IN-subquery pull-up and causes a slower SubPlan |
| Previous Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2026-08-17 08:09:09 | RE: Per-table resync for logical replication subscriptions |